Case study

Magus EOR onshore terminal, case studies

The BP Magnus Enhanced Oil Recovery (EOR) project consisted of a gas pipeline from the West of Shetland (WoS) via Shetland to the Magnus offshore oil production platform located in the northern North Sea. By injecting WoS gas into the Magnus oil reservoir, more oil could be recovered, while the gas could now be brought to the market instead of disposed of underground. BP feared that the project could attract opposition as a pipeline to the west would open up the WoS area for further development.

The EIA that BP had commissioned was rejected by the law firm that the company had hired to ensure that it would stand up in court. The EIA described environmental sensitivities that were not fully understood and made promises that could not be kept.

Without an EOR project, the economics of the Magnus facilities would force it into early decommissioning and there was little time to safe the project. Without a rewrite of the EIA, there was a significant risk that BP would be taken to court and that the delays would make the project uneconomic. Shareholder confidence and company value would have been impacted.

It proofed possible to restructure the existing EIA within a short space of time, into a format that received the unreserved approval of the company’s lawyers. The Four-Quadrant EIA™ approach was adopted to proactively address all stakeholder concerns. The gaps in BP’s understanding of the local environment could be used as strength, the risk assessment was modernized and the promises that could not be kept were replaced with ones that could. The new EIA had 300 pages less than the original one.

The project was approved without legal challenge and shareholder confidence restored. The approval increased the economics of the Schiehallion, Foinaven and Magnus fields. It also aided the subsequent development of the Clair field.

Related posts

Panda coinJos Tissen

A visualization of the conflict between development and conservation

This page aims to visualize the conflict between development and conservation. Sets of images are presented to show that an incomplete definition of nature and an incomplete sense of accountability will ultimately hinder our progress.
Boat navigating the riverJos Tissen

Exploration of environmental responsibility

This article explores the meaning of the term environmental responsibility. It makes a distinction between healthy responsibility and unhealthy responsibility. I believe that modern environmentalism leads to disproportionate feelings of responsibility and immobilization. Responsibility is not only about your own behavior, but also about your interaction with others and about the context of your behavior. If we act on this, we may discover our underlying motivation and see new ways to improve the situation at least a little bit.
Modern and classic windmills and Jean Jacques RousseauJos Tissen

Beyond the ideas of Jean Jacques Rousseau

The success of contemporary environmentalism is largely due to the philosophy of Jean Jacques Rousseau. It is unfortunate that the movement doesn't seem to realize that their success is also limited by his philosophy. The question how our environmental impacts should be reduced is no longer the right one. It should be replaced with the question: how do you want to live on this planet?
Tulips_cultural symbol of the NetherlandsJos Tissen

Reducing environmental impact without making anybody wrong

It is not difficult to blame nuclear energy, meat, cars, fossil fuels, windmills, coal plants or intensive farming for the world’s environmental problems. Is it possible to reduce our environmental impact without making anybody wrong? This article shows the mechanisms behind these accusations. That insight invites people to see new opportunities and make creative choices.
Organizations depicted in intersecting cogsJos Tissen

A new future for managing environmental issues

The method described in this publication is a novel and more effective approach for the management of environmental issues; one that recognizes and pro-actively manages external expectations as well as addressing the environmental impact. The approach was refined in cooperation with Ian Buchan from ENGIE E&P UK Limited.
Theater visitors in anticipationJos Tissen

The difference between subjective and objective environmental data

Informed decisions need to be based on unbiased information; but is that even possible? It is important to realize that questions and statements are value driven. When I look at data, I want to separate the facts from their cultural interpretation.
Staged battle in fieldJos Tissen

Which side to choose in a polarized environmental debate

Despite believing that the polarization around environmental issues is grounded in our common culture and that the resulting conflict is artificial, I still find the feud between parties frustrating. If only I could tempt parties to stop their rant long enough for them to discover that their differences are not real.
Segments of 4-quadrant ES

Four-Quadrant EIA

The Four-Quadrant EIA is the EnvAid flagship approach for carrying out an Environmental Impact Assessment (EIA). In addition to managing your issues in a very focused and effective way, a Four-Quadrant EIA results in a significantly more positive presentation of your project.
HSE meeting

Identification of Environmental Management Strategies

An effective environmental management system is built around effective environmental management strategies; i.e. ones that are capable of dealing with the technical and emotional nature of environmental issues, the often conflicting interests and that offer constructive ways of managing these issues.