Case study

Douglas platform, case studies

The BHP Billiton Liverpool Bay oil and gas development (now operated by Eni) is located in one of the most sensitive near shore environments of the UKCS. A large number of important bird sanctuaries are located within 40km of the development.

After ten years of operation, the field production consent needed to be renewed and a newly appointed environmental advisory body advised the regulator against continued production; claiming that oil production and bird protection are incompatible. Neither BHP nor the regulator knew how to unlock the stalemate negotiations.

Without a proper response, the production consent would have expired, putting an end to the offshore development and the associated onshore gas terminal and would have deprived a newly constructed gas fired power plant of feedstock. UK CO2 emissions would have increased. Supply contracts would have been breached and legal compensation sought. The company’s operations in the UK would have folded.

BHP Billiton adopted the EM3.0™ approach to environmental issue management. This allowed the grid-locked parties to value each other’s interests and the societal benefits of continued production. An environmental statement was prepared that addressed the key concern of oil spill risk in significant detail. The company’s environmental track record in the context of the promises that it had made during the initial approval process was also presented.

Renewal of the production consent was granted and subsequent permit applications went considerably smoother. Stakeholder confidence in BHP was restored. Jobs were secured and the produced oil and gas satisfied the energy demand of many consumers.

Related posts

Road in South of EnglandJos Tissen

A roadmap for companies

This article is for those companies that have realised that their future is uncertain under current environmental legislation and under rising opposition from the general public. It offers a way out for these companies. It suggests that the problem is caused by several simplifications, provides insight into the underlying problems, offers a tool to redefine company environmental issues, and discusses alternative and more effective response strategies.
Panda coinJos Tissen

A visualization of the conflict between development and conservation

This page aims to visualize the conflict between development and conservation. Sets of images are presented to show that an incomplete definition of nature and an incomplete sense of accountability will ultimately hinder our progress.
Boat navigating the riverJos Tissen

Exploration of environmental responsibility

This article explores the meaning of the term environmental responsibility. It makes a distinction between healthy responsibility and unhealthy responsibility. I believe that modern environmentalism leads to disproportionate feelings of responsibility and immobilization. Responsibility is not only about your own behavior, but also about your interaction with others and about the context of your behavior. If we act on this, we may discover our underlying motivation and see new ways to improve the situation at least a little bit.
Modern and classic windmills and Jean Jacques RousseauJos Tissen

Beyond the ideas of Jean Jacques Rousseau

The success of contemporary environmentalism is largely due to the philosophy of Jean Jacques Rousseau. It is unfortunate that the movement doesn't seem to realize that their success is also limited by his philosophy. The question how our environmental impacts should be reduced is no longer the right one. It should be replaced with the question: how do you want to live on this planet?
Train in front of The Hague skylineJos Tissen

Polarization and reducing the environmental burden

Polarized engagements are normal and almost feel natural. Why is it beneficial to continue like this; who wins? In this post, I would like to demonstrate that a polarized approach is ineffective and how environmental communication can be improved. Simple logical tests can be applied to invalidate polarized arguments and to identify common ground. An analysis of payoffs and costs can reveal further options for bridging differences.
Tulips_cultural symbol of the NetherlandsJos Tissen

Reducing environmental impact without making anybody wrong

It is not difficult to blame nuclear energy, meat, cars, fossil fuels, windmills, coal plants or intensive farming for the world’s environmental problems. Is it possible to reduce our environmental impact without making anybody wrong? This article shows the mechanisms behind these accusations. That insight invites people to see new opportunities and make creative choices.
Theater visitors in anticipationJos Tissen

The difference between subjective and objective environmental data

Informed decisions need to be based on unbiased information; but is that even possible? It is important to realize that questions and statements are value driven. When I look at data, I want to separate the facts from their cultural interpretation.
Staged battle in fieldJos Tissen

Which side to choose in a polarized environmental debate

Despite believing that the polarization around environmental issues is grounded in our common culture and that the resulting conflict is artificial, I still find the feud between parties frustrating. If only I could tempt parties to stop their rant long enough for them to discover that their differences are not real.
Segments of 4-quadrant ES

Four-Quadrant EIA

The Four-Quadrant EIA is the EnvAid flagship approach for carrying out an Environmental Impact Assessment (EIA). In addition to managing your issues in a very focused and effective way, a Four-Quadrant EIA results in a significantly more positive presentation of your project.